Paid News Sandhya Ravi Shankar article on 29.1.2017 is false (Part -2)

Already I give reply to paid news Sandhya’s false news published on 29.1.2017 in Wire Magazine with documentary evidence and proof of documents also by Tamil which is available in http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/2912017.html . Part of the same already translated in English and posted  which is available in http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/paid-news-sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html

Already I have mentioned that, I will translate and post the other part in soon. Accordingly the other part for the Tamil posting is translated and given below. In this also, I have clearly mentioned the truth with documentary evidences. I did not mention without evidence and all the evidences are referred and all the documents were perused by Sandhya during January 2015. But with ulterior motive, since she has to fulfill the commitment to her boss, she did not mention nothing about the same. On 29.01.2017 article, she mention two persons namely Banerjee and Daniel as, a very big expert and voluntary organization.  If the website address, email, name and address, and educational qualifications   of the said Banerjee and Daniel with their organization name, then we can find out that, this two gentleman also a gang member of this Sandhya Gang Just like an old lady gang member coming in “Oomai Vizikal” cinema.  That is why, she did not mention the above said details.

Doesn’t a fair journalist give that information? At least hereafter give the details. So that, all will know about them. She mentioned that the license from the Department of Atomic Energy was given in 2001 and in 2002 some part of land was cancelled.  It is true. What is the violation of law there? Why she did not mention that?  This proves that she is vomiting for the money received. Isn’t it?  What is the connection between this and the Jeyalalitha regime?

What is the connection between the cancelling of the illegal order of the Central Government by the High Court and the period of Ruling of Jayalalitha? Why she is making knots to knee and the shaved head? If she would have written above your article that, “I am vomiting for the money I have received”, then nobody would have criticized her.

It is mentioned about the Gagandeep Singh Bedi Collector order in 2002. While he was the Sub Collector in Cheran Mahadevi during 1996, there was enmity and revenge for him and criminal case and complaint in Human Rights Commission were filed and after the interference of the Superintendent of Police the matter was arrived compromise. Subsequently when he became the Collector of Kanyakumari District, keeping the enmity in mind, he refused to recommend issuing license to the patta land of V.V. Mineral Company. After obtaining the order from High Court, he recommended with the motive to dismiss it. The Commissioner informed the Tamil Nadu  Government that his report is illegal and the same was informed by the Tamil Nadu Government to the Central Government and after the prior approval of the Central Government, and based on the High Court order, the license were issued. Are she ready sewere that all the above mentioned items are not seen by her in January 2015?

Here, where lies the illegality? Where lays the Ruling of Jayalalitha? What is the difference between throwing the feaces and publishing Sandhya’s article? When one portion of the patta land has gone inside the sea, how there will be coastal Poramboke land?  If it is so, how they make people fools. What is the connection between taking sand from the coastal region and the safety of Hill areas?  Without any connection the coastal regions were also announced as Hill areas. What is the connection between V.V. Minerals and the recommending to alter the HACA area before the Proposal of the V.V. Mineral are reaching?  Even then, V.V. Minerals have obtained the license after getting the permission from the HACA and from Ministry of Environment and Forest. What is the role of Ruling of Jayalalitha in this?

Again the Lizard of the Fencing, Environmental Activist mentioned by them is coming to the picture. Let the details of him, So that, we can collect the details of how much money he has looted from the Government under the guise of project as done by Victor Rajamanikam. Does she ready to give their educational qualification, Website address, etc., If it is published, then it will come to know that he is also a gang member of this Sandhya.

In the young age those who want to stay away from going to school, will not say that he is having fever, he will say that he is having stomach ache or head ache. Sandhya was also following the same procedure and are telling that sea erosion. In fact the sea erosion and the coastal destruction are not in any part of the area in which the lease is given to V.V. Minerals.  Why because it has obtained the permission from MoEF under CRZ Notification and are following the conditions strictly. Rather, the sea erosion is there in the area where the Indian Rare Earth is functioning which is functioning without CRZ clearance. Further the sea erosion is the issue all over the world. There are sea erosions in Ennore, Thalankuppam, Pondicherry, Nagapattinam, and in all over the world. She is writing a subject which does not have any connection, in order to make the courts turn against VV Mineral, as spitting the poison for the money received. What is the difference between to mercenary force who murder for money and Sandhya who write false news for money?

Please ask Sandhya to publish the details of about Daniel and Banerji. Once the details are published, then it will be proved that they are also a member of the mercenary force like her. Normally most of the persons those who claim as Environmental Volunteers usually release these types of news  and will get bribe money (mamool) from the concerned Company. As far as we know there is no such Environmental Organization. Hence, in order to prove that Daniel and Banerji are bonafied environmentalist, doesn’t she publish the details? When we particularly ask about the same, and inform by twitter to her, what prevent her to publish the same?

Since Dhanushkodi Adithan Company is the competitor Company to the V.V. Minerals Company, they have given a petition against V.V. Minerals by obtaining signature from 20 MPs.  In the said petition they have mentioned an allegation that V.V.  Minerals have taken possession illegally of a mining lease to Daya Devadas. The petition came to the State Government for Enquiry. It happened during the period of Ruling by DMK having coalition with the congress party of Dhanushkodi Adithan. Under the circumstance that the High Court after examining the above allegation and has dismissed the same, the State Government gave reply that the State Government is not intending to interfere in this issue, since already it has been decided by the Honourable High Court.  This is the truth and not others. The above  said Copies and reply were given to Sandhya in January 2015 itself.  Does Sandhya ready to swear to refuse the same?

Again they obtained the signature from the MLAs and MPs and gave the complaint. The State Government appointed the Officers of other District to conduct 100% inspection and verification of documents.  Then the State Govt., reported to the Central Government that the Complaint is not a true one and these complaints are written due to business motive.  Since Congress was power in Central, Dhanushkodi Adithan approached and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and obtained the order to inspect again the same area along with Central Govt., department officials. Accordingly two Central Govt., department and one State Govt., department jointly inspected again all the areas and also verified the documents from the Port Trust and from the Customs Department etc.,  and reported to the Prime Minister through the Minister of Mines that there is no truth in the Complaint given by Daya Devadas Gang. The said file is still with the Ministry of Mines of  Government of India. Here where does the ruling of Jayalalitlha play the role? Instead, Sandhya is vomiting for the money received by her. Is Sandhya is ready to promise that she did not see the copy of the above report and the copy of the File during January 2015? Is it not duty of those who praise her to ask about this.?

She should have recorded the opinion of Prabir Banerjee who is the Lizard who says witness for Fencing, after giving his full details, with educational qualification, and the website address etc., if she refer his opinion it may be fair. Otherwise, how it is fair.?  Prabir Banerjee who is the Lizard who says witness for Fencing has not read the report of Tamil Nadu Government issued in 2004. Sandhya who has obtained copy of it from Vaikundarajan in person in January 2015 has also not shown to him, and has not opened her mouth also about it. Is it not a conspiracy? Whether is it correct to appreciate as a talented journalist? Then what is the wrong to refer Sandhya as Small Phoolan Devi? The said report is there in the website address at:

http://www.beachminerals.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/23-Govt-Lr-Dated-24-11-2004- By-VVM-Pdf. Those who have praised Sandhya up to the sky shall read the above once and then record your comments on her. This is not applicable to the members of loot gangster who has recorded praising her.

DMK Regime 2006-2011

Since the Government was that of the coalition of DMK and Congress parties, Dhaya Devadas through his partner Dhanushkodi Adithan did some activities by forcing the DMK Government against V.V. Minerals. The said responsibility was given to the then Chief Secretary Tripathi. Conveniently the TATA Steels which lost its case against V.V.Minerals in Supreme Court also joined against V.V.Mineral. We have heard in the Puranas that since no place was given to Thrisanku Maharaja in paradise, St. Viswamithra created a separate paradise for him. Similarly, for the only reason that Vaikundarajan should be troubled, IAS was conferred to Jothi Nirmala, who is in the 13^th place, by expelling 12 Senior District Revenue officers above her, and appointed her as the collector in Kanyakumari, and registered some criminal cases in Kanyakumari and some other places and then searched who is the enemy of V.V. Minerals in police Department and appointed him as the DIG in Tirunelveli and gave trouble. It is pertinent to point out here that, without any charges, pending against them, 12 DROs were over looked to give a particular officer IAS. The Government of Tamilnadu, Public (Special –A) Department Letter No. 1359/2008-1 dated 10.5.2008 mentioned that “there is no charges against the above said 12 senior officers who avoided the seniority for IAS”. Can Sandhya promise that she has not seen all above during January 2015?

Not only this. Mr. Jawahar Chandrasekar, the District Revenue officer who filed case for bypassing their Seniority for IAS was arrested by the Vigilance Department. Now tell me, who does the Government support, whether it supported the Looting gang in where Sandhya is a member or whether it supported Vaikundarjan? All the above happened on the back force of Daya Devadas, the Boss of Sandhya. Does she ready to swear that she did not see the letter?

Again in order to give trouble, they made inspection of the entire  mining lease areas and the Factories by the Department Heads of Pollution Control Board, Environmental Department, Geology and Mines Department and obtained a report. But while the said inspection was conducted, VV Minerals Company recorded the entire Inspection through a Video recording by the cameramen of a private TV channel.  Therefore those officers were pushed to a situation to give a factual report that there is no violation on V.V. Minerals and all the faults are with other Companies only. The said report is with Daya Devadas itself is there. He also have obtained the said report under the Right to information Act. Is Sandhya Ready to  obtain the said report and publish it?

What is the connection between Vaikundarajan and the sand dune in Kuttam village were no mining lease to Vaikundarajan? It is a vomiting for the money received nothing other than that.  

Since they could not succeed their attempt in the inspection of the HOD’s, the Chief Secretary entrusted the work to the Joint Director of Geology and Mining, Mr.Bhaskar (I will mention about him in the next paragraph) that something has to be done against V.V. Accordingly Mr. Bhaskar invite all the three districts Assistant Director to Chennai and he himself prepare an inspection report as done by the Assistant Directors and prepare a show cause notice to VV Mineral pointing out certain violations and asked them to send it through the District Collector.

The then District Collector told that he will not sign in that report unless he personally carryout the field inspection and find out the violations because he told that, V.V. Minerals will not make any violations. Immediately the Deputy Director replied that the Joint Director Bhaskar prepared this report from the office of the Director, and this report was prepared as per the direction of the Chief Secretary and it is asked to obtain signature from Collector and to send. So the Collector said to make endorse this fact in the office notes and place it for signature. Accordingly the truth was mentioned in the office notes and then it was signed and it is the truth that the report was sent on the provocation of Daya Devadas, the Boss of Sandhya.

Immediately a case was filed before the Court in Tirunelveli by V.V. Minerals, stating  that, a false notice is issued with ulterior motive, so an advocate Commissioner to be appointed for re inspection with the same officer who already submit inspection report with a request that, the above inspection should be video graphed. The advocate commissioner inspected the field along with the same Assistant Director and recorded in Video and also submitted the report in the court that there is no fault on VV Mineral. Then immediately the concerned Assistant Director got transfer and went. The next Assistant Director who came in that post again inspected the field and found that there is no fault on VV Mineral and the reply given by VV Mineral is correct and submit his report to the District Collector. Accordingly the District Collector drop the violation notice.  The copies of the above note files were obtained by Daya Devadas, the Boss of Sandhya also under Right to information Act. Let Sandhya read the office note and shall publish to the public or can be seen on obtaining it under the Right to Information Act. Doesn’t it prove it that the position of journalist has scooped down to the level that supporting one side in a business competition and is writing against the truth by doing conspiracy? Where there is no answer in this?  Does Sandhya ready swear on this?

An allegation is told that Ramesh sold Ilmenite. In fact prior to 2005 anybody can sell Ilmenite by paying Royalty. This was given in the Mineral Concession Rules itself. After that only it was told to get separate permission. Hence there is no violation. The word play used against Ramesh cannot even played against V.V. Mineral even for joke. Banerjee who is the member in this loot gang, on what basis did he gave the opinion?

Specialty of this Sandhya Gang:

1. Without the license fee, the mining  lease cannot be given. The mining lease should be granted as per the act in force at the time of grant - This is the judgment issued by the Supreme Court in various cases. This can also be seen in the decision of the case Hind Stone Vs. State of Tamil Nadu . But, 5 mining leases were given to Mr. Daya Devadas in Tirchy District without mining lease application fee, and Income Tax clearance certificate. If the above GOs are read, then it will be understood. Since Mr. Bhaskar, who was the Assistant Director during that period, has allowed the leasse by suppressing the violation and also for preparing the violation report against V.V. Minerals and sending it in 2007, even after his retirement he has joined this plundering Gang and is obtaining salary till now. If asked he says that he is working in Dayadevadas Indian Garnet Sand Company. What is his role in the illegal mining for 39 lakhs ton in Trichy? Now tell, in who’s favour the Govt., is?

2. Sandhya has written praising on 2.2.2015 about his Fellow Gang Force member Victor Raja Manickam, that he is a great Geologist. And there is none other than like him. But Victor Raja Manickam has taken up various forms saying that “I am a Tamil medicine Expert, I am doing research in it, so give me money”, in another form that “I am doing Research that  how much Human Resources are required for Bihar State and so please give money for that”, in another Form saying that “he is doing Research how to prevent from coming of Tsunami , and he needed money for that”, and in another form that “he is doing the survey about the reserve of the coastal Minerals and he needs money for that” and in that way he exploited the money of the India Government. Since his younger brother Samathanam was working in the Science and Technology Department it became easy for them to exploit the Government. The Daya Devadas gang is also in connivance for this act. Can Sandhya promise that she has not seen those documents in 2015?

That is why, Victor Rajamanikkam was telling witness for him. If the details of Banerjee and Daniel are published  then we will put those unpleasant secrets on the track.

Regime of Jayalalitha 2011-2016

Sandhya has shown her Loyalty by saying only that action has been taken on Daya Devadas for illegal mining and has suppressed that Daya Devadas has done mining of Rs.39 lakhs ton of minerals and that he has done illegal mining by breaking the shore of irrigation dam and public road and that he has threatened the officers who went to inspect the place. Long live Sandhya for her sincerity to Dayadevadas! The illegal mining of 39 Lakhs ton minerals and violation can be read in goo.gl/LL70 B2. In this way for the action taken 4 years back also no money was collected by the Government. Without putting security from the Revenue Department or from Police Department or from any other government agency for the 14 Lakhs Ton of minerals seized,  the govt., has kept the entire 14 lakhs ton of minerals under Daya Devadas custody and the key was given to the thief itself. Now tell me. To whom does the Government Support and with whom has she joined?

This looting gang has expanded their territory. In that way they took a Retd., IAS officer who was working in the office of Chief Minister. He advised that, if Dhayadevadas makes any news to come in the paper, he will convinced the Chief Minister and obtained order against VV Mineral. Accordingly, a letter addressed to  the Chief Secretary was obtained from the transferred Collector Ashish Kumar, who belongs to this looting group (the said letter only was published by Sandhya on 28.1.2017) and was published in the News papers as he told. As promised, he obtained the Government order appointing Gagandeep Singh Bedi who is against V.V. Minerals for conducting Inspection. Then the report will come as they think. V.V. Minerals needed an inspection without the interference of the politicians. Hence V.V. filed case in the Court to issue direction to appoint a retired High Court or Supreme Court judge belonging to a different State. What is wrong in it? How the report of Gagan Deep Singh Bedi will be fair when he has personal enemity with VV Mineral? Since the said case is pending in the Court, I am not commenting on that.  Does Sandhya ready to swear that, she did not see the Human Right Commission order and other enemity related papers of Bedi during January 2015? Is it fair to hide the papers she has read and take copies?

It is also mentioned that the mining plans are prepared fraudulently along with the 75 to 78 percentage of replenishing Minerals. This is also mentioned by Sandhya with ulterior motive. The first Mining Plan of Mr.Dhayadevadas, the gang leader for his mining lease in Appanallur, Poolancheri in Tiruchy District was prepared by Victor Raja Manickkam, who is the Godfather of Sandhya who is also the member of the looting gang, and the Indian Government gave approval as per Indian Bureau of Mines TN/TCR/MP/GNT/1428-Mds dated 27.5.2002. In that mining  plan it was mentioned that “it will contain the reserve of 1,13,306 ton of the Raw sand consisting of 30 percent of Garnet and 20,395 ton of saleable Garnet can be mined”. Dhaya Devadas also has certified that the said plan is prepared on his full consent and knowledge.

What is to be highlighted in this is that Sandhya who thinks to use all the weapons like Nuclear Mines, Nuclear Power, Uranium, Thorium against V.V. , has read the following sentences mentioned in the above mentioned Mining Plan in January 2015. It is:

“The alluvial Garnet Sand applied by the company being a heavy Mineral Concentrate, is like to contain schedule (radioactive) minerals like Ilmenite, Monazite etc., Therefore the Company has obtained the AMD of the Department of Atomic Energy , Government of India for a NOC for mining the Garnet from the applied area.”

Where is the Uranium and Thorium which came from the above Monazite? Did Dayadevadas hand over it to the Government? Whether he exported stealthily? Whether this also reached the Anti Social Elements? What is the reason to Sandhya for not opening her mouth about this, when she read the above wordings in the Xerox copy of the mining plan during January 2015? Is she a fair journalist?  Don’t the educated people having social thought want to ask the question to Sandhya? Does Sandhya ready to swear that she did not see the mining plan?

Again one more mining plan was submitted by a retired officer by name, Munaf for the same mining  lease area.  This time,  the quantity of Garnet availing as replenishable is raised to 446764 ton. The approval number of that Mining plan is TN/TCR/MP/GNT/1686-Mds dated 28.11.2008. This also seen by Sandhya during 2015.  If it is told that it is fraudulent for 78 percent Replenishable then what is the name for 400 percent replenishable obtained by her Boss Dayadevadas. She saw both in January 2015. But why she did not open her  mouth about this? What prevent her to write about this 400% replinishable when she discussed about 78% of others?  Is it not proving her hidden agenda? Are you ready to swear  by denying this?

After mentioning the beach minerals in Kuttam, she is  mentioning Vaikundarajan. Since there is no allegation on Vaikundarajan, she is speaking something. Is this the ethics of Journalism? Now again the Lizard came as the witness to Fencing. In fact the license to V.V. Minerals was issued after the Central Government officers came and inspected that there is no sand dune to a distance of 500 meters and has also obtained the certificate from the authorities and after that only the license was issued. Sandhya who have seen all the above and was satisfied in January 2015, did not reveal the above facts. Is it the Ethics of Journalism? It did not prove Sandhya’s hidden agenda? Does Sandya ready swear by denying that she did not see the documents?

Which case was confused in which court? In fact this argument is created on the advice of a Judge in order to prejudice the Judiciary against V.V. Mineral. As there are fake addresses in the Face Book to scold other persons, Sandhya is mentioning the name of two persons in fake as Danial and Banerji. Why she is refusing to give the details about them? Is it a fair journalism?  Is it not duty of people who appreciate her article to insist her to give the details about this two persons?

After getting replinishable approval to Dhayadevadas mines, Dayadevadas want to cancel all other lessees approval. So that, he can become monopoly in this industry. With that hidden agenda, Daya Devadas obtained an order from Mrs. Santhasheela Nair while she was the Secretary to Ministry of Mines, who is so close to Daya Devadas to appoint a committee to study the replinshable and such other matters. A committee was also appointed. The head of that Committee was Nagar, who is the close friend of Daya Devadas. But contrary to his expectation, the Nagar Committee gave a report that Replenishable will be there and that there are chances of 100 percent Replenishable for 200 days in a year and that it is not illegal to take Replenishable and that it cannot be accurately calculated the amount of Replenishable. The state of Daya Devadas was like scorpion bit the thief. The report of the Nagar Committee formed as per the Government of India Mining Department Letter No. 16/90/2007/M-VI dated 8.1.10  was also read by Sandhya in January 2015. But with ulterior motive, she has not mentioned, about the mining plan approved to Dayadevadas with 400% and the Nager Committee report. Is it a fair journalism?  Or is the ethics of journalist? I leave this to the decision of those who praised her.

New Atomic Mineral Concession Rule:

Daya Devadas who is moving the dice using the force of his partner being the Congress former Minister in each level, made to extension one Mr.Parihar, a retired officer in the post of Director of Atomic Mineral Division for additional two years. The condition for that is, that no permission should be given to V.V. Mr.Parihar was also following the condition very perfectly. Hence these Atomic Mineral Rules were formed through him with the intention that it will destroy this V.V. But this will destroy the entire beach mineral Industry in India and the growth of India. I did not like to say further opinion on that.

Again she says , some opinion told by Lawyer Sriram Panchu. But she purposefully dropped that the said Sriram Panchu is appearing against V.V. Minerals in 10 cases between Indian Rare Earths Limited and V.V. Minerals. Is this the honest writing? Dear Honest people, is in this way is your honesty also?

It is told that he said that it should not be given to private sector like Kerala. But the Honourable Supreme Court has  issued order to Kerala Govt., to give license to private sector  and it was published in all the Newspapers including Economic Times in which the husband of Sandhya is working. Sandhya may not be finding time to read Newspapers.

It is mentioned that Vaikundarajan has told that there is no clarity in the Atomic Mineral Concession Rules. It is true. Nothing is there to deny it.

Sandhya is very carefully moving the dice to give this industry to Adani in monopoly along with Indian Rare Earths Limited. Is Sandhya ready to deny all the explanation given above?

Is Sandhya ready to swear on her father or on her child that the above mentioned documents and explanations were not seen by Sandhya and her husband in their office in the presence of Mr.Vaikundarajan and Venkatesh during January 2015?  Does Sandhya ready to swear that, she do not know about the above said facts and she did not collect copies from Mr.S.Vaikundarajan including Court judgments.  

Is writing by suppression the truth called the Ethics of Journalism?

The righteous persons who praised, you please read all the above and please visit the links and read it and then give your opinion.

What evidence has she given except copy of her gang member Ashiskumar letter for which he has already prosecuted and copy of one memo filed by the affected person during 1996?

 If it is righteous persons then it would have been written that the report of the officer who has enmity should not be accepted, is it not? At least hereafter you please write.

If what is stated above is not true ask Sandhya to swear either on her father or her child in a temple in your presence and myself and Mr.Vaikundarajan also will come along with Venkatesh. Please insist Sandhya to swear on this.

If  she refused to swear, let her to come along with you to a temple choose by you who praised her, and Mr.Vaikundarajan will swear on this. Does Sandhya ready to accept the challenge? Not only Vaikundarajan swear. We have collected some other evidences against Sandhya to establish the nexus between Dayadevdas gang and the Retired DGP.  After  that, we will release.

Dear all, those who praise Sandhya, please ask her to swear in your presence denying all my above explanation.

Paid News Sandhya Ravi Shankar article on 29.1.2017 is false (Part -1)

Paid News Sandhya Ravi Shankar again wrote about Vaikundarajan on 29.1.2017. Not only the anger that her husband was not given on asking a job in News 7 Television channel, but though Mr. Ravi Shankar has told to Subramanian, son of Vaikundarajan, meeting him in person on 17.10.2013 and also through e mail requesting that he himself will be with him and will start that Television Channel and under the circumstance that it was not allowed, and not only due to that anger, but what is written  by Sandhya who is getting monthly salary from Daya  Devadas who is the competitor of Vaikundarajan, are all false.

On 28.1.2017 already objection has been sent for writing like this and has recorded the same.  Some questions were asked her through Twitter also.

They are, why it was not written about the illegal mining for about Rs.39 lakhs by Daya Devadas?  Why you did not write the relationship between him and you? Why it was not written that where the Uranium and Thorium did in those 39 lakhs went? There is no reply. About Sundaram, the father of your friend Radhika, and about Kalyanaraman, friend of Sundaram, and about how she got the letter of the Collector Ashish Kumar without office seal? Whether it was given by Ashish Kumar or by the Chief Secretary Sheela Balakrishnan? But she gets angry saying that to not to talk about Kalyanaraman who do the work of turning the RSS leadership against, who are there in the Henchmen gang, and about business partner Radhika. If it is calm about other issues then is it not true!

As it is told that “Lizard is the witness to the fencing”, there are some other persons praising this. All of them have relationship with this Hench men Gang in one way or the other. Now their veil has to be torn. Therefore it is necessary to record the history of 30 years here.

I know very well Vaikundarajan. His Character also will be in consonant with what Sandhya has recorded today (30.1.2017). But certainly he will not do wrong. He will not argue unless at least there is 51 percentage of justice. Even if it is about Sandhya, who writes for money or even if it is about others, he will not worry about anything. If it is told that Dharman and Raman went to Forest on banishment. He will just say one word reply that let us think that we are in banishment. But unless these types of journals who joins along with the business competitors and publishing the news against the truth and the arrogant reporters are eliminated from this Society, the development of India is a Question mark!!

All of them have joined together in doing this job in the way that the enemy of an enemy is a friend, and in the way that various income from one stone. Not only Daya Devadas is affected due to the growth of V.V. Company. A foreign Company also is affected. Please see : goo.gl/0HDqjg

They settled the money to Radhika daughter of Sundaram who is running a Company in partnership with Sandhya in Singapore. Daya Devadas also settled his share in India. The Gujarat Adani who also wants to come up as monopoly in this business also paid an amount to write like this. When you disturb an innocence business man public will raised voice against them. There as she portray him as an illegal minor then they can achieve what they want. This is the hidden agenda of Sandhya.  So if she has given seal of illegal mining, then nobody will come to his support, is it not? When some hits dog with stone, it is unacceptable by public. Whereas, if you claim the dog is infectious rabbis , then all others will support the killing. The same theory is used by  Sandhya Ravi Shankar & Co.

There is a big gang in this. The gang includes,  Retired IPS Higher Police Officers, I.A.S. officers, Geologists, and those who worked in Geology and Mines Department and got retired, politicians, and journalists. The retired Police higher officer is spending 3 hours daily along with Sandhya. As per his advice only the news are coming out.  The above said retired IPS officer and two IAS officers are the persons who decide that when and at what time the news should be released.

Once the news is published in the Newspaper, the job of reaching it to the concerned places is taken up by a Judge who is left Tamilnadu for promotion. The questions asked for the articles done by Sandhya on 28.1.2017 has not answered yet. Why?  Because the money given to her is not for that. Some prodigies praised up to the sky. Is there no rule of law in India. ? Is there no law enforcing Government in India? Is there no fair judicial system in India? Why not we think that it will be like this – For the past 30 years the Officers and Court was functioning honestly. But why the Central Government official in order to help a north Indian company? Why a State Govt., officials should not act against for the reasons which cannot be told. Why nobody has question this?

No prodigies questioned that why the explanation given by V.V. Company for the above allegation was not published. This itself proves that each of them above are connected in this Gang plot.

Sandhya has written as illegal mining as a regurgitation, and that for the past 30 years the officers did conspiracy. The person who enters into the area of V.V. Company in 1996  illegally and was attacked by the fishermen, and has given apology letter to Vaikundarajan, and keeping that enmity in mind , then what other way do  he give his petition? Leave alone this, did she give any proof or document from any government department that VVM has exported more minerals than the royalty paid quantity. Does she show any proof that VV has exported monazite or other prohibited items? Where is the Proof on her article.

She has claimed that from 2013 to 2016 total 40,000 Crores worth of beach minerals were exported. Does she give any proof for that? No. She simply published some factory photographs. Will it mean illegal mining? The Indian Rare Earth Ltd, function at Manavalakurichi is rumored to be taken over by Adani and that is why Innayam Port is being constructed by Adani. In fact public has listing the flags against it. How is IREL separting the minerals in the factory? Why can’t Sandhya write anything about it? Does it have CRZ Clearance.? Does it have permisisiion to take water from Valliaaru river? Why she did not open the mouth?

If there is any proof of violation by VVM and if she is willing to show that, we will also support her. Instead throwing feaces for the money received should be condemned by the educated people.

She has not talked about other Companies. Why because, all of them pay the bribe customarily (mamool) to her. She is attacking only Vaikundarajan, since she is not giving the bribe.

She has published News against the truth on 29.1.2017 as follows.

“It was mentioned that the law is administered very badly and hence using the loopholes of the law Vaikundarajan is doing wrong . Which loophole in which law? If there is a loophole then why others are not using the loophole for their benefit? Under the circumstance that he is having several licenses then why he wanted to act illegally?”

Political Twist – Reply

She mentioned in 1998 DMK Government formed a Committee. They found out the large amount of mistakes. But there was no action.  No such Committee was formed.  No inspection was also done. Where is that report?  If the said report have been obtained by her illegally or if he would have stolen it then let her give the File number, let us see. Actually what happened? In 1998, the Central Union Minister of State Mr. Dhanushkodi Adithan who is the partner along with Daya Devadas in the Indian Garnet Sand Company, which is the competitor Company of Vaikundarajan, was defeated by Ramarajan, in Thiruchendur Constituency. Some of the news papers wrote that since Vaikundarajan worked against the Minister only he was defeated. Based on that, a petition was submitted to the  Chief Minister Karunanidhi by obtaining the signature of Jenifer Chandran, Minister of Fisheries Department, three District Secretaries of DMK and 20 MLAs. The petition was that if Vaikundarajan is there then DMK will be ruined completely, and there was no inspection except the petition.

Mr. Daya Devadsas used to send minimum four complaints in a year in the name of various persons.  Regularly the Central and State Government used to inspect the field jointly and severally and verify the documents used to give report that the complaints are not true. No political strength is needed for this. They have not obtained the political support as Maran brothers did that they are the grandsons of the Chief Minister, or by advertising that if the paper cost Rs.3 is purchased, the materials worth Rs.10/- is free. Instead, while all the Companies there were struggling for the Government land and to acquire the Individual lands, at that time V.V. Company purchased the land in their name and obtained the license. Hence obtaining license was easy to them.  This is the truth and it is not otherwise as told by Sandhya that Government has given concession to V.V. Company in any manner. Ask her to tell any specific item. Instead, I will explain how and at what times did Daya Devadas, the head of the Sandhya’s Gang, used the Government officers against V.V. Company  will be explained by me later wherever it is necessary.

Till 1998, the contribution of Private Company is very less. In order to bring Daya Devadas into this business and to obtain huge amount from the Government, Mr. Daya Devadas and Victor Rajamanickam together arranged a conference in Tamil University, Thanjavur and under the leadership of Mr. Victor Raja Manickam a Resolution was passed that now the Indian Government company is exporting only for Rs.40 Crores per year. If the Laws are relaxed, and if Private sectors are allowed to this field, then the export can be made for more than Rs.500 Crores per year. In the said stage Mr. Daya Devadas was also were there. Can she deny it?

Further Mr. Victor Rajamanickam, through his brother Samathanam has obtained several Crores of rupees under the pretext of surveying the reserves of these Minerals and has completed the survey using his students and before reporting it to the Government the same was informed to Daya Devadas and 65 Lease applications were submitted through Daya Devadas. The entire land is belonged to the Government and third party. Therefore they were finding difficulty in obtaining the license easily.

The entire money obtained for the survey of these minerals was misappropriated by Victor Raja Manickam using the vouchers for Xerox and Telephone charges. The photocopy of the above said Vouchers was shown as it is to Sandhya in January 2015 by Vaikundarajan obtained under RTI Act. Did the honest Sandhya write any article on that?  The reason for not writing it is that the said Victor Raja Manickam also is the member in the Sandhya’s gang.

In 1998 while Mr. Vajpayee was the prime Minister of India, Since India has 30% of world reserve, whereas, mining ratio is very low and realizing that the valuable minerals are getting wasted and it is not able to quarry the same by the Government company and hence it was decided to open it to private sector. Based on that only, the private persons got the entry into this field.  Due to the above decision of Vajpayee only the export of Minerals which was doing from Rs.45 Crores by India Government has now reached to Rs.4500 Crores per year. The business employment from 700 persons was multiplied into several thousands. Does Sandhya not read the Policy on Beach Mineral during January 2015 from Vaikundarajan.? Since specific assignment was given to Sandhya and Kalyanaraman to spread through the internet, I think that they say the decision of Vajpayee also is wrong.

She mentioned one thing saying that the leader of Aam Admi Party has spoken. Though the total number of lease mining with V.V. Minerals is 50, but the total extent is less than 1000 hectare. At the same time India Cements Company is having lease mining for more than 5000 Hectares. But for Sandhya, 1000 is appearing as Monopoly than 5000. Let the readers decide that is this the racial affection? Or is there any other reason? He mentioned one thing as the enclosure by Aam Admi Party. She found out a very big truth that Vaikundarajan has share in Midas Company. But she left without publishing that Vaikundarajan has bought shares in the various Companies including King Fisher and in the Television Channels including Sun TV, and Raj TV etc., and that Vaikundarajan or his brother is not the Directors or the Managing Directors either in Midas Company or in Jaya TV has been purposefully suppressed by Sandhya. I hope Sandha would not be having selective Amnesia. If it so, she has suppressed with motive and with plan that the said Companies are not administered by them and that they are also have invested  just like other investors and subsequently sold out the shares. How can we tell her a fair journalist???

Let her submit the proof that Vaikundarajan was the Director of Jaya TV in the Registrar of Companies. If she submit it then we will admit her honesty. Who will appreciate the writing on imagination of the false news for the money received from the competitor Company, except those in Gang? This is the only proof she mentioned for that the Government is in connivance. In what way the Government acted in connivance? What proof has she given for that? She has released the Colour Xerox of the letter of Ashish Kumar who is the member of Sandhya’s gang, given by him, and if it is so why the proof is not released. Is the name called fair journalist?

Ruling period of Jayalalitha – 2001 – 2006

 A reference has given by him that an order was issued to the Coastal Management stating that the V.V. Minerals has obtained the mining lease by violating the Coastal management Rules and are mining illegally and the same should be stopped , and that this has been given on the permission of the District Coastal Committee  and that it is mentioned as wrong and since it is given that the action should be taken within 15 days it was taken to the Sessions Court and filed case and obtained order. The capacity of this gangsters are that how they keep a person in each Department and how they have the officers in their hand and obtain the orders prepared through them, in the same way, they have kept the personnel of the Central Environment Department also and has prepared the affidavit containing the facts against truth by themselves and has made to file in the Madurai high Court. This is the truth.

In fact under the Coastal Regulation Zone Rules exemptions have given to the beach minerals. A lease has been granted without the permission of the Coastal management Rules to Indian Garnet Company belonged to Daya Devadas, Sandhya’s Boss, herefore the Periyathazhai village people filed writ petition in the high Court of Madras to cancel the license. The High Court also decided that there is need to get CRZ Clearance for this beach minerals.  It is ordered in Writ Petitions No.11971 and 15451 of 1995 that there is no necessity to obtain the clearance from MOEF. The copy of the order issued by the high Court was given to Sandhya when Vaikundarajan and Venkatesh met Sandhya in January 2015. But now suppressing the same, throwing feaces for the money received. Is this the ethics of Press? Whether Sandhya is ready to sewer that she has not seen the high Court order and she has not received the copy of the High Court order?

As it is told that Lizard is the witness to the fencing she is telling about two person from Environmental Volunteer Organization. Let her publish the full details of that person. Give the website of that Organization with their education qualification. Then only we can very whether the persons belonging to this gang is having such an organization. Do Sandhya have that courage?

We will come to the subject. When T.R. Balu was the Environmental Minister, Daya Devadas and Danushkodi Adithan has approached T.R. Balu Minister and told that unless VV Mineral is prevented, they are not able to do the business and have asked him to help them. T.R. Balu direct a woman officer and asked her to do the help to Daya Devadas. The woman officer came and inspected and as told by Sandhya, she ordered to stop the mining by the V.V. Minerals immediately. Since it was decided by the High Court in the case filed by Daya Devadas that there is no need to get CRZ Clearance, Vaikundarajan filed case before the High Court of Madras saying that the order is issued with ulterior motive and hence the order has to be scrapped. In the enquiry, since the letter was written to support and help Daya Devadas it was not able to produce the file before the Court. Hence the Assistant Solicitor General has instead of telling it is a plot, has told that it is the letter in between the departments. He mentioned that it is not the order against V.V. Minerals. The High Court recorded this and ordered accordingly. The copy of the above order was given to Sandhya. The order copy of Writ petition Number is 25125 and 31688 of 2002, and whether Sandhya can swear that she did not see the order and did not get the order? Whether she is ready to swear on that??? Is this the ethics of Press by suppressing the facts?  If the order of High Court is appearing as the order from Sessions Court for Sandhya, don’t she want to checkup their eyes?

If she would have mentioned the above said high Court orders and by seeking opinion from her Lawyers and if she would have included the opinion along with her article then she is praiseworthy.  But what did she do? As the fake business is done on the platforms such as Delhi halwa, Bombay Muscoth, various poses of photos of Vaikundarajan is included in all pages and she is doing the business. If it is so don’t she entitled to Royalty for that?

பெய்டு நியூஸ் சந்தியாவின் 30.01.2017 தேதிய வஞ்ச புகழ்ச்சி பற்றி குறிப்பு

    வாங்கிய காசுக்கு வஞ்சகம் இல்லாமல் மலத்தை அள்ளி வீசும் சந்தியா பற்றி நேற்று தமிழில் ஒரு பதிவிட்டு இருந்தேன். ஆங்கில பதிப்பு இன்று வரும் என கூறி இருந்தேன். இன்னும் ஆங்கில மொழியாக்கம் முடியாததால் அது நாளை பதியப்படும். இதற்கிடையில் நேற்று வஞ்சபுகழ்ச்சியாக சில பதிவுகள் செய்திருந்தார். அது பற்றிய பதிலை கீழே பார்க்கலாம்.

    விஷத்தை விஷம் என்று தெரியாமல் இருக்க இனிப்பு தடவி கொடுப்பது போல் முதலில் திரு.வைகுண்டராஜனின் குணநலன்களை கூறுகிறார். அப்புநடேசன் எம்.எல்.ஏ. மூலம் மத்திய அரசுக்கு எழுதி இந்த பாலிசி மாற்றியதை கூறுகிறார். அதில் என்ன தவறு. இந்தியாவின் கனிமம் வெளிநாட்டிற்கு வீணே போவதை தடுத்து இந்தியாவிற்கு பல ஆயிரம் கோடி ரூபாய் வருமானம் கிடைக்கவும் பல ஆயிரம் நபர்களுக்கு வேலை வாய்ப்பு கிடைக்கவும் மாற்றப்பட்டதில் தவறு என்ன? அன்னிய நிறுவனங்களிடமும் பணம் வாங்கி கொண்டு திரு. வைகுண்டராஜனை திட்டுவதற்கு என்றே உள்ள சந்தியாவிற்கு இது தவறாக தெரிந்தால் அது அவர் குற்றமே தவிர மற்றவர்கள் குற்றம் இல்லை.

    இந்தியாவில் ஒரு குடும்பத்தில் ஒருவர் தான் ஒரு குறிப்பிட்ட தொழிலை செய்ய வேண்டும் என உள்ளதா? குடும்பத்தில் உடன் பிறந்த சகோதரர்கள் இந்த தொழிலை செய்யக் கூடாதா? இதில் என்ன தவறு உண்டு? 200 குற்றவழக்குகள், 150 உரிமையியல் வழக்குகள் - உண்மை தான். சந்தியா போன்ற பலமான பின்புலம் உள்ள அடியாட்களை வைத்திருக்கும் ஒரு மத்திய அமைச்சரை எதிர்த்து தொழில் செய்தால் இம்மாதிரி குற்ற வழக்குகளை பார்க்க வேண்டியது ஏற்படும் தான். முன்பகைக்கும் பணத்திற்கும் புலனாய்வு என மலத்தை அள்ளி வீசும் சந்தியாவிற்கு ஆதரவாக பல்வேறு அடியாள் கூட்டங்கள் பதிவு செய்கின்றனவே, நேற்று நான் பதிந்தவற்றை பார்த்து அவர்கள் பதில் கொடுக்க வேண்டாமா?

    பத்திரிக்கையாளர் என்ற முறையில் சட்ட புறம்பாக செய்யும் செயல்களை இம்மாதிரி பதிவிட்டு பாதுகாப்பது எவ்வகையில் நியாயம். நேற்றைய பதிவு அவர் செய்தது அவர் வாங்கிய காசுக்கு அதற்கு இரண்டு தினங்களுக்கும் முன்னால் திரு.வைகுண்டராஜனுக்கு எதிராக பதிவுகளை அனைவரும் படிப்பதற்கு தானே!! இதற்கு பெயர் பத்திரிக்கை தர்மமா?

    2015 ஜனவரியில் திரு.வைகுண்டராஜனை சந்தித்தேன் என கூறுகிறாரே!! நேற்றைய என்னுடைய பதிவு http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/2912017.html ல் உள்ளது. அது அவருக்கும் அவருக்கு ஆதாரவானவர்களுக்கும் ஏற்கனவே அனுப்பப் பட்டுள்ளது. அதில் கூறப்பட்டவை பொய் என்று சந்தியா சத்தியம் செய்ய தயாரா? அவளுக்கு ஆதார அளிப்பவர்கள் முதலில் அதை கேட்டு உறுதி செய்யுங்கள். சரி என்றால் என்று எங்கு என உறுதி செய்யுங்கள். அங்கு வருகிறோம். அப்படி இல்லை என்றால், உங்களுக்கு மனசாட்சி உண்டு என்றால், சந்தியாவின் 3 நாள் பதிவிற்கும் நீங்கள் பாராட்டி போட்ட பதிவுகளை வாபஸ் வாங்குங்கள். இல்லை என்றால் அவளது கொள்ளைக்கும் நாங்கள் துணை தான் என நேரடியாக பதியுங்கள்.

    கேக் சாப்பிட்டது, மற்றவர்களை சந்தித்தது ஆகியவற்றையும் வியாபாரத்திற்காக திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் படத்தோடு போடும் இவர் ஒரு பத்திரிக்கையாளரா? நவீன விபச்சாரியா? இதனை வெளியிடும் பத்திரிக்கைக்கும் ஒரு மஞ்சள் பத்திரிக்கைக்கும் என்ன வித்தியாசம்?

    சுண்ணாம்பு கல் இருப்பு இருக்கும் நிலத்தை அதிக விலை கொடுத்து வாங்க முயற்சித்தேன் என கூறியதில் என்ன தவறு?  ஒரு சிலரை போல் ஏமாற்றவில்லை. மிரட்டவில்லை. வாங்கிய பணத்திற்கு ஒரு படி மேலே போய் தன்னை மிரட்டுவதாக மற்றவர்கள் மூலம் பதிவிட்டு அப்படியும் தான் நினைத்த காரியத்தை முடிக்க வேண்டும் என நினைக்கவில்லை.

    ஒருவேளை இவரது கணவர் நடத்தும் டெல்டாபோர் காஸ்ட் நிறுவனத்திடம் வைகுண்டராஜன் ஒப்பந்தம் போட்டு மாத மாமூல் கொடுத்திருந்தால் இவர் எழுதி இருக்க மாட்டாரோ!!. அந்த நிறுவனம் இவரது கணவருக்கு உண்டா? இல்லையா? அதன் மூலம் திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் மகனை சந்தித்து பேரம் பேசினாரா இல்லையா? இது நவீன வழிப்பறி இல்லையா? சந்தியாவிற்காக கொடி பிடித்த சத்தியவான்களே இதற்கு பதில் சொல்லுங்கள்.

    60 சதவீதம் கொடுத்து நான் சுற்றுச்சூழல் அனுமதி வாங்கினேன் என வைகுண்டராஜன் கூறியதாக பதிவிட்டு உள்ளாரே? அவரது குழந்தை அல்லது தந்தை பெயரில் இது உண்மை என சத்தியம் அடிப்பாரா? உண்மையில் நடந்தது சுற்றுச்சூழல் அறிக்கை தயாரிக்க 25 முதல் 30 லட்சம் கேட்டார்கள். எனக்கு ஏராளமான அறிக்கைகள் தயாரிக்க வேண்டியது இருந்ததால் நான் சுற்றுச்சூழலில் முனைவர் பட்டம் பெற்ற ஒரு நபரை நிரந்தரமாக பணி அமர்த்தி அதன் மூலம் தயாரித்தேன் என கூறினார். தயாதேவதாசின் வழக்கிற்கு பொய் சாட்சி தயாரிப்பதற்காக அதனை மாற்றிக் கூறும் சந்தியா சத்தியம் அடிப்பாரா? கொடி பிடிக்கும் சத்தியவான்களே இதை கேட்டு சொல்லுங்கள்.

    சுரங்க துறையில் 15 கோடி ரூபாய் கேட்டதற்கு அதை கொடுக்க மாட்டேன் என கூறி நீதிமன்றத்தில் போராடி வெற்றி பெற்றதில் என்ன தவறு உண்டு. சந்தியா சட்டவிரோதமாக கவுரவ மிரட்டல் கொடுத்தற்கும் தான் திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் பணியவில்லை.

    சந்தியாவின் நோக்கம் எந்த கனிமங்களும் வீணாகலாம். ஆனால் அரசுக்கு வருவாய் வரும் என்றாலும், திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் வகையறாவிற்கு அது உபயோகப்படக் கூடாது. இந்த நோக்கம் ஒரு பொது நன்மை உள்ளது தானா? நேற்று ஒரு நண்பர் தமிழகம் முழுவதும் சட்ட விரோத சுரங்க பணி நடக்கிறது என்பது அனைவருக்கும் தெரியும் என பெங்களுரில் இருந்து பதிவிட்டு இருந்தார். நிச்சயம் அவர் இந்த கொள்ளை கூட்டத்தை சேர்ந்த பெங்களுர் உறுப்பினராக தான் இருப்பார்.

    படிப்பரியா கீழ்தட்டு மக்கள் அருவா, கத்தி உபயோகித்து கொள்ளை அடிக்கும் போது, படிப்பறிவு உள்ள மேல்தட்டு சந்தியா மற்றும் அவரது கூட்டாளி போன்றவர்கள் பத்திரிக்கை செய்தி, புலன் விசாரணை என கவுரவ மிரட்டல் விடுத்து கொள்ளை அடிக்கிறார்கள். நண்பரே நான் ஆதாரங்களை தான் பதிய சொன்னேன். நீங்கள் பொங்க வேண்டாம். சந்தியாவிடம் சொல்லி ஆதாரங்களை பதிய சொல்லுங்கள். அல்லது எனது பதிவில் குறிப்பிட்டபடி அவர் எதையும் பார்க்கவில்லை என சத்தியம் அடிக்க சொல்லுங்கள்.

    திரு. தனுஷ்கோடி ஆதித்தனை பேட்டி கண்டதாக கூறி உள்ளீர்களே! வேலிக்கு சாட்சி சொல்ல வரும் ஓணான் பிரபீர் பானர்ஜி பற்றிய விபரங்களை ஏன் நீங்கள் வெளியிடவில்லை. நீங்கள் வெளியிடுங்கள். அவரும் உங்கள் கொள்ளை கூட்டத்தில் ஒரு உறுப்பினர் என்பதை ஆதார பூர்வமாக நிரூபிக்கிறோம்.

    உண்மை. 51 சதவீதம் நியாயம் இருந்தால் வாதாடுவது உண்மை தான். அதில் என்ன தவறு. விக்டர் ராஜமாணிக்கம் அவர் மீது உள்ள குற்றச்சாட்டை மறுத்தார் என பதிவிட்டு உள்ளீர்களே! தகவல் அறியும் உரிமை சட்டத்தில் பெற்ற அந்த ஆவணங்களை நீங்கள் பார்வையிடவில்லையா?? அவ்வாறு பார்வையிடவில்லை என நீங்கள் சத்தியம் அடிக்க தயாரா? உங்கள் கொள்ளை கூட்டத்தை சேர்ந்த ஒரு உறுப்பினர் என்பதால் நீங்கள் நற்சான்று வழங்குகிறீர்களா?

    திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் வழக்குகளால் தொந்தரவு பண்ணுவார் என கூறுகிறீர்களே!! அவரால் வழக்கு போடப் பட்ட நபர்களின் பட்டியலை கூறுங்கள் பார்ப்போம். உங்களை போன்ற படித்த கிரிமினல்களின் பின் புலத்தோடு திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் மீது தான் ஏராளமான வழக்குகள் போடப்பட்டுள்ளனவே தவிர திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் யார் மீதும் வழக்கு போடவில்லை. ஒரு பெருச்சாளியை அடித்தால் கூட போக்கிடம் இன்றி அடிக்கும் போது அடிப்பவர் மேலே பாயும். அப்படி இருக்கும் போது நியாயமாக தொழில் செய்யும் திரு.வைகுண்டராஜனை வாங்கிய பணத்திற்காக தொந்தரவு செய்தால் எதிர்ப்பதில் என்ன தவறு. ககன்தீப் சிங் பேடி பற்றி நேற்று பதிந்துள்ளேன். அத்தனை ஆவணங்களையும் ஜனவரி 2015-ல் நீங்களே பார்த்தீர்கள். இல்லை என நீங்கள் உங்கள் குழந்தை மீது சத்தியம் அடிப்பீர்களா?

    தயாதேவதாஸ் மட்டும் தொடர்கிறார் என கூறுகிறீர்கள். உண்மை தான். காரணம் உங்களை போன்ற படித்த கிரிமினல்கள் அவரோடு உடன் இருந்து திட்டமிட்டு கொடுப்பதும் திரு.வைகுண்டராஜன் நியாயவானாக இருப்பதும் தான் அதற்கு காரணம்.

    குடும்பத்தில் சகோதர்களுக்குள் தகராறு வராதா!! இது உங்களுக்கு ஒரு செய்தியா!!! நண்பருக்கு உதவி செய்வது ஒரு செய்தியா!!!!

    திரு.வைகுண்டராஜனின் ஆரம்ப கால வாழ்க்கையை கூறுகிறீர்களே!! உங்களது ஆரம்ப கால வாழ்க்கையை பதிவிடுங்களேன். ஒரு பெரிய அரசியல் தலைவர், அவரது மகன் இவ்வாறு உங்களது தொடர்பு நீண்டு கொண்டே போகும் என சொல்வார்களே!! அதனையும் தயவு செய்து பதிவிடுங்களேன்.

    உங்களையும் கூட யாருக்கும் பினாமி என்று குறிப்பிட்டு சொல்லி விடவும், பதிந்து விடவும் முடியும். உங்களுக்கும் உங்கள் கணவருக்கும் ஒரு நிறுவனத்திலும் பங்கு இல்லையா? மறுத்து சொல்லுங்கள் பார்ப்போம். உங்களுக்கு கொடி பிடித்த அடிவருடிகளில் ஒருவருக்கும் பங்கு இல்லையா? நிறுவனங்களில் பங்கு முதலீடு செய்வது ஒரு குற்றமா? தொழிலாளர்களிடம் பிரியமாக இருப்பது ஒரு குற்றமா?

    உங்களது பத்திரிக்கையை விளம்பர படுத்த வேண்டும் என்பதற்காக ஒரு நல்லவரை பல்வேறு போஸ்களில் படத்தையும் போட்டு வாங்கிய பணத்திற்கு வாயால் எடுத்து எழுதி உள்ளீர்களே, இதற்கு பதிலாக பத்திரிக்கையை நடத்துபவர், எழுதுபவர் குடும்பத்தில் உள்ள நபர்களின் படங்களை பல்வேறு போஸ்களில் பதிவீர்களா!!!

    இப்போதும் சொல்கிறேன். நான் நேற்று பதிந்தவற்றை உண்மை அல்ல என நீங்கள் உங்கள் குழந்தை மீது அல்லது உங்கள் தந்தை மீது உங்களுக்கு வக்காலத்து வாங்கிய நபர்கள் முன்னிலையில் ஒரு கோவிலில் வைத்து சத்தியம் அடியுங்கள். அந்த இடத்திலேயே நான் உங்களிடம் நிபந்தனை அற்ற மன்னிப்பு கேட்கிறேன். அதனை எழுத்து மூலம் உங்கள் பத்திரிக்கையில் வெளியிடவும் கடிதம் தருகிறேன். இல்லை என்றால் அதே நபர்கள் முன்னிலையில் அனைத்தும் உண்மை என்பதை உங்களிடம் அவற்றை காண்பித்த வெங்கடேஷ்சும், திரு.வைகுண்டராஜனும் ஒன்றாக வந்து சத்தியம் அடிப்பார்கள். சவாலுக்கு தயாரா???

    பதிலை பதியுங்கள். அனைவருக்குமே தெரியட்டும். உங்களுக்காக பொங்குபவர்களுக்கு உண்மை தெரியட்டும். இதன் ஆங்கில பதிப்பும் விரைவில் இணையத்தில் பதிவேற்றம் செய்யப்படும்.