Already I give reply to paid news Sandhya’s false news published
on 29.1.2017 in Wire Magazine with documentary evidence and proof of documents
also by Tamil which is available in http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/2912017.html
. Part of the same already translated in English and posted which is available in http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/paid-news-sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html
Already I have mentioned that, I will translate and post the
other part in soon. Accordingly the other part for the Tamil posting is
translated and given below. In this also, I have clearly mentioned the truth
with documentary evidences. I did not mention without evidence and all the evidences
are referred and all the documents were perused by Sandhya during January 2015.
But with ulterior motive, since she has to fulfill the commitment to her boss,
she did not mention nothing about the same. On 29.01.2017 article, she mention
two persons namely Banerjee and Daniel as, a very big expert and voluntary
organization. If the website address,
email, name and address, and educational qualifications of the said Banerjee and Daniel with their organization
name, then we can find out that, this two gentleman also a gang member of this
Sandhya Gang Just like an old lady gang member coming in “Oomai Vizikal” cinema.
That is why, she did not mention the
above said details.
Doesn’t
a fair journalist give that information? At least hereafter give the details. So
that, all will know about them. She mentioned that the license from the
Department of Atomic Energy was given in 2001 and in 2002 some part of land was
cancelled. It is true. What is the
violation of law there? Why she did not mention that? This proves that she is vomiting for the
money received. Isn’t it? What is the
connection between this and the Jeyalalitha regime?
What
is the connection between the cancelling of the illegal order of the Central
Government by the High Court and the period of Ruling of Jayalalitha? Why she
is making knots to knee and the shaved head? If she would have written above
your article that, “I am vomiting for the money I have received”, then nobody
would have criticized her.
It
is mentioned about the Gagandeep Singh Bedi Collector order in 2002. While he
was the Sub Collector in Cheran Mahadevi during 1996, there was enmity and
revenge for him and criminal case and complaint in Human Rights Commission were
filed and after the interference of the Superintendent of Police the matter was
arrived compromise. Subsequently when he became the Collector of Kanyakumari
District, keeping the enmity in mind, he refused to recommend issuing license
to the patta land of V.V. Mineral Company. After obtaining the order from High Court,
he recommended with the motive to dismiss it. The Commissioner informed the Tamil
Nadu Government that his report is
illegal and the same was informed by the Tamil Nadu Government to the Central
Government and after the prior approval of the Central Government, and based on
the High Court order, the license were issued. Are she ready sewere that all
the above mentioned items are not seen by her in January 2015?
Here,
where lies the illegality? Where lays the Ruling of Jayalalitha? What is the difference
between throwing the feaces and publishing Sandhya’s article? When one portion
of the patta land has gone inside the sea, how there will be coastal Poramboke
land? If it is so, how they make people
fools. What is the connection between taking sand from the coastal region and
the safety of Hill areas? Without any
connection the coastal regions were also announced as Hill areas. What is the
connection between V.V. Minerals and the recommending to alter the HACA area before
the Proposal of the V.V. Mineral are reaching? Even then, V.V. Minerals have obtained the
license after getting the permission from the HACA and from Ministry of
Environment and Forest. What is the role of Ruling of Jayalalitha in this?
Again
the Lizard of the Fencing, Environmental Activist mentioned by them is coming
to the picture. Let the details of him, So that, we can collect the details of how
much money he has looted from the Government under the guise of project as done
by Victor Rajamanikam. Does she ready to give their educational qualification, Website
address, etc., If it is published, then it will come to know that he is also a
gang member of this Sandhya.
In
the young age those who want to stay away from going to school, will not say
that he is having fever, he will say that he is having stomach ache or head
ache. Sandhya was also following the same procedure and are telling that sea
erosion. In fact the sea erosion and the coastal destruction are not in any
part of the area in which the lease is given to V.V. Minerals. Why because it has obtained the permission
from MoEF under CRZ Notification and are following the conditions strictly. Rather,
the sea erosion is there in the area where the Indian Rare Earth is functioning
which is functioning without CRZ clearance. Further the sea erosion is the issue
all over the world. There are sea erosions in Ennore, Thalankuppam,
Pondicherry, Nagapattinam, and in all over the world. She is writing a subject
which does not have any connection, in order to make the courts turn against VV
Mineral, as spitting the poison for the money received. What is the difference
between to mercenary force who murder for money and Sandhya who write false
news for money?
Please
ask Sandhya to publish the details of about Daniel and Banerji. Once the
details are published, then it will be proved that they are also a member of
the mercenary force like her. Normally most of the persons those who claim as Environmental
Volunteers usually release these types of news and will get bribe money (mamool) from the
concerned Company. As far as we know there is no such Environmental Organization.
Hence, in order to prove that Daniel and Banerji are bonafied environmentalist,
doesn’t she publish the details? When we particularly ask about the same, and
inform by twitter to her, what prevent her to publish the same?
Since
Dhanushkodi Adithan Company is the competitor Company to the V.V. Minerals
Company, they have given a petition against V.V. Minerals by obtaining signature
from 20 MPs. In the said petition they
have mentioned an allegation that V.V. Minerals
have taken possession illegally of a mining lease to Daya Devadas. The petition
came to the State Government for Enquiry. It happened during the period of Ruling
by DMK having coalition with the congress party of Dhanushkodi Adithan. Under
the circumstance that the High Court after examining the above allegation and has
dismissed the same, the State Government gave reply that the State Government
is not intending to interfere in this issue, since already it has been decided
by the Honourable High Court. This is
the truth and not others. The above said
Copies and reply were given to Sandhya in January 2015 itself. Does Sandhya ready to swear to refuse the
same?
Again
they obtained the signature from the MLAs and MPs and gave the complaint. The
State Government appointed the Officers of other District to conduct 100%
inspection and verification of documents.
Then the State Govt., reported to the Central Government that the
Complaint is not a true one and these complaints are written due to business motive.
Since Congress was power in Central, Dhanushkodi
Adithan approached and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and obtained the order to inspect
again the same area along with Central Govt., department officials. Accordingly
two Central Govt., department and one State Govt., department jointly inspected
again all the areas and also verified the documents from the Port Trust and
from the Customs Department etc., and
reported to the Prime Minister through the Minister of Mines that there is no
truth in the Complaint given by Daya Devadas Gang. The said file is still with
the Ministry of Mines of Government of
India. Here where does the ruling of Jayalalitlha play the role? Instead,
Sandhya is vomiting for the money received by her. Is Sandhya is ready to
promise that she did not see the copy of the above report and the copy of the
File during January 2015? Is it not duty of those who praise her to ask about
this.?
She
should have recorded the opinion of Prabir Banerjee who is the Lizard who says
witness for Fencing, after giving his full details, with educational
qualification, and the website address etc., if she refer his opinion it may be
fair. Otherwise, how it is fair.? Prabir
Banerjee who is the Lizard who says witness for Fencing has not read the report
of Tamil Nadu Government issued in 2004. Sandhya who has obtained copy of it
from Vaikundarajan in person in January 2015 has also not shown to him, and has
not opened her mouth also about it. Is it not a conspiracy? Whether is it
correct to appreciate as a talented journalist? Then what is the wrong to refer
Sandhya as Small Phoolan Devi? The said report is there in the website address
at:
http://www.beachminerals.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/23-Govt-Lr-Dated-24-11-2004-
By-VVM-Pdf. Those who have praised Sandhya up to the sky shall read the above
once and then record your comments on her. This is not applicable to the
members of loot gangster who has recorded praising her.
DMK Regime 2006-2011
Since
the Government was that of the coalition of DMK and Congress parties, Dhaya Devadas
through his partner Dhanushkodi Adithan did some activities by forcing the DMK
Government against V.V. Minerals. The said responsibility was given to the then
Chief Secretary Tripathi. Conveniently the TATA Steels which lost its case
against V.V.Minerals in Supreme Court also joined against V.V.Mineral. We have
heard in the Puranas that since no place was given to Thrisanku Maharaja in paradise,
St. Viswamithra created a separate paradise for him. Similarly, for the only
reason that Vaikundarajan should be troubled, IAS was conferred to Jothi
Nirmala, who is in the 13th place, by expelling 12 Senior District
Revenue officers above her, and appointed her as the collector in Kanyakumari,
and registered some criminal cases in Kanyakumari and some other places and
then searched who is the enemy of V.V. Minerals in police Department and
appointed him as the DIG in Tirunelveli and gave trouble. It is pertinent to
point out here that, without any charges, pending against them, 12 DROs were
over looked to give a particular officer IAS. The Government of Tamilnadu,
Public (Special –A) Department Letter No. 1359/2008-1 dated 10.5.2008 mentioned
that “there is no charges against the above said 12 senior officers who avoided
the seniority for IAS”. Can Sandhya promise that she has not seen all above during
January 2015?
Not
only this. Mr. Jawahar Chandrasekar, the District Revenue officer who filed
case for bypassing their Seniority for IAS was arrested by the Vigilance
Department. Now tell me, who does the Government support, whether it supported
the Looting gang in where Sandhya is a member or whether it supported
Vaikundarjan? All the above happened on the back force of Daya Devadas, the
Boss of Sandhya. Does she ready to swear that she did not see the letter?
Again
in order to give trouble, they made inspection of the entire mining lease areas and the Factories by the
Department Heads of Pollution Control Board, Environmental Department, Geology
and Mines Department and obtained a report. But while the said inspection was
conducted, VV Minerals Company recorded the entire Inspection through a Video
recording by the cameramen of a private TV channel. Therefore those officers were pushed to a
situation to give a factual report that there is no violation on V.V. Minerals
and all the faults are with other Companies only. The said report is with Daya
Devadas itself is there. He also have obtained the said report under the Right
to information Act. Is Sandhya Ready to obtain the said report and publish it?
What
is the connection between Vaikundarajan and the sand dune in Kuttam village
were no mining lease to Vaikundarajan? It is a vomiting for the money received
nothing other than that.
Since
they could not succeed their attempt in the inspection of the HOD’s, the Chief Secretary
entrusted the work to the Joint Director of Geology and Mining, Mr.Bhaskar (I
will mention about him in the next paragraph) that something has to be done
against V.V. Accordingly Mr. Bhaskar invite all the three districts Assistant
Director to Chennai and he himself prepare an inspection report as done by the
Assistant Directors and prepare a show cause notice to VV Mineral pointing out
certain violations and asked them to send it through the District Collector.
The
then District Collector told that he will not sign in that report unless he
personally carryout the field inspection and find out the violations because he
told that, V.V. Minerals will not make any violations. Immediately the Deputy
Director replied that the Joint Director Bhaskar prepared this report from the
office of the Director, and this report was prepared as per the direction of
the Chief Secretary and it is asked to obtain signature from Collector and to
send. So the Collector said to make endorse this fact in the office notes and
place it for signature. Accordingly the truth was mentioned in the office notes
and then it was signed and it is the truth that the report was sent on the
provocation of Daya Devadas, the Boss of Sandhya.
Immediately
a case was filed before the Court in Tirunelveli by V.V. Minerals, stating that, a false notice is issued with ulterior
motive, so an advocate Commissioner to be appointed for re inspection with the
same officer who already submit inspection report with a request that, the
above inspection should be video graphed. The advocate commissioner inspected
the field along with the same Assistant Director and recorded in Video and also
submitted the report in the court that there is no fault on VV Mineral. Then
immediately the concerned Assistant Director got transfer and went. The next
Assistant Director who came in that post again inspected the field and found
that there is no fault on VV Mineral and the reply given by VV Mineral is
correct and submit his report to the District Collector. Accordingly the
District Collector drop the violation notice. The copies of the above note files were
obtained by Daya Devadas, the Boss of Sandhya also under Right to information
Act. Let Sandhya read the office note and shall publish to the public or can be
seen on obtaining it under the Right to Information Act. Doesn’t it prove it
that the position of journalist has scooped down to the level that supporting
one side in a business competition and is writing against the truth by doing
conspiracy? Where there is no answer in this? Does Sandhya ready swear on this?
An
allegation is told that Ramesh sold Ilmenite. In fact prior to 2005 anybody can
sell Ilmenite by paying Royalty. This was given in the Mineral Concession Rules
itself. After that only it was told to get separate permission. Hence there is
no violation. The word play used against Ramesh cannot even played against V.V.
Mineral even for joke. Banerjee who is the member in this loot gang, on what
basis did he gave the opinion?
Specialty of this
Sandhya Gang:
1.
Without the license fee, the mining lease cannot be given. The mining lease should
be granted as per the act in force at the time of grant - This is the judgment
issued by the Supreme Court in various cases. This can also be seen in the
decision of the case Hind Stone Vs. State of Tamil Nadu . But, 5 mining leases
were given to Mr. Daya Devadas in Tirchy District without mining lease application
fee, and Income Tax clearance certificate. If the above GOs are read, then it
will be understood. Since Mr. Bhaskar, who was the Assistant Director during
that period, has allowed the leasse by suppressing the violation and also for
preparing the violation report against V.V. Minerals and sending it in 2007,
even after his retirement he has joined this plundering Gang and is obtaining
salary till now. If asked he says that he is working in Dayadevadas Indian Garnet
Sand Company. What is his role in the illegal mining for 39 lakhs ton in Trichy?
Now tell, in who’s favour the Govt., is?
2.
Sandhya has written praising on 2.2.2015 about his Fellow Gang Force member
Victor Raja Manickam, that he is a great Geologist. And there is none other than
like him. But Victor Raja Manickam has taken up various forms saying that “I am
a Tamil medicine Expert, I am doing research in it, so give me money”, in
another form that “I am doing Research that
how much Human Resources are required for Bihar State and so please give
money for that”, in another Form saying that “he is doing Research how to
prevent from coming of Tsunami , and he needed money for that”, and in another
form that “he is doing the survey about the reserve of the coastal Minerals and
he needs money for that” and in that way he exploited the money of the India
Government. Since his younger brother Samathanam was working in the Science and
Technology Department it became easy for them to exploit the Government. The
Daya Devadas gang is also in connivance for this act. Can Sandhya promise that
she has not seen those documents in 2015?
That
is why, Victor Rajamanikkam was telling witness for him. If the details of
Banerjee and Daniel are published then
we will put those unpleasant secrets on the track.
Regime of Jayalalitha
2011-2016
Sandhya
has shown her Loyalty by saying only that action has been taken on Daya Devadas
for illegal mining and has suppressed that Daya Devadas has done mining of
Rs.39 lakhs ton of minerals and that he has done illegal mining by breaking the
shore of irrigation dam and public road and that he has threatened the officers
who went to inspect the place. Long live Sandhya for her sincerity to
Dayadevadas! The illegal mining of 39 Lakhs ton minerals and violation can be
read in goo.gl/LL70 B2. In this way for the action taken 4 years back
also no money was collected by the Government. Without putting security from
the Revenue Department or from Police Department or from any other government
agency for the 14 Lakhs Ton of minerals seized,
the govt., has kept the entire 14 lakhs ton of minerals under Daya
Devadas custody and the key was given to the thief itself. Now tell me. To whom
does the Government Support and with whom has she joined?
This
looting gang has expanded their territory. In that way they took a Retd., IAS
officer who was working in the office of Chief Minister. He advised that, if
Dhayadevadas makes any news to come in the paper, he will convinced the Chief
Minister and obtained order against VV Mineral. Accordingly, a letter addressed
to the Chief Secretary was obtained from
the transferred Collector Ashish Kumar, who belongs to this looting group (the
said letter only was published by Sandhya on 28.1.2017) and was published in
the News papers as he told. As promised, he obtained the Government order
appointing Gagandeep Singh Bedi who is against V.V. Minerals for conducting
Inspection. Then the report will come as they think. V.V. Minerals needed an
inspection without the interference of the politicians. Hence V.V. filed case
in the Court to issue direction to appoint a retired High Court or Supreme
Court judge belonging to a different State. What is wrong in it? How the report
of Gagan Deep Singh Bedi will be fair when he has personal enemity with VV Mineral?
Since the said case is pending in the Court, I am not commenting on that. Does Sandhya ready to swear that, she did not
see the Human Right Commission order and other enemity related papers of Bedi
during January 2015? Is it fair to hide the papers she has read and take
copies?
It
is also mentioned that the mining plans are prepared fraudulently along with
the 75 to 78 percentage of replenishing Minerals. This is also mentioned by
Sandhya with ulterior motive. The first Mining Plan of Mr.Dhayadevadas, the
gang leader for his mining lease in Appanallur, Poolancheri in Tiruchy District
was prepared by Victor Raja Manickkam, who is the Godfather of Sandhya who is
also the member of the looting gang, and the Indian Government gave approval as
per Indian Bureau of Mines TN/TCR/MP/GNT/1428-Mds dated 27.5.2002. In that
mining plan it was mentioned that “it
will contain the reserve of 1,13,306 ton of the Raw sand consisting of 30 percent
of Garnet and 20,395 ton of saleable Garnet can be mined”. Dhaya Devadas also
has certified that the said plan is prepared on his full consent and knowledge.
What
is to be highlighted in this is that Sandhya who thinks to use all the weapons
like Nuclear Mines, Nuclear Power, Uranium, Thorium against V.V. , has read the
following sentences mentioned in the above mentioned Mining Plan in January
2015. It is:
“The
alluvial Garnet Sand applied by the company being a heavy Mineral Concentrate,
is like to contain schedule (radioactive) minerals like Ilmenite, Monazite
etc., Therefore the Company has obtained the AMD of the Department of Atomic Energy
, Government of India for a NOC for mining the Garnet from the applied area.”
Where
is the Uranium and Thorium which came from the above Monazite? Did Dayadevadas hand
over it to the Government? Whether he exported stealthily? Whether this also
reached the Anti Social Elements? What is the reason to Sandhya for not opening
her mouth about this, when she read the above wordings in the Xerox copy of the
mining plan during January 2015? Is she a fair journalist? Don’t the educated people having social
thought want to ask the question to Sandhya? Does Sandhya ready to swear that
she did not see the mining plan?
Again
one more mining plan was submitted by a retired officer by name, Munaf for the
same mining lease area. This time, the quantity of Garnet availing as replenishable
is raised to 446764 ton. The approval number of that Mining plan is
TN/TCR/MP/GNT/1686-Mds dated 28.11.2008. This also seen by Sandhya during 2015.
If it is told that it is fraudulent for
78 percent Replenishable then what is the name for 400 percent replenishable obtained
by her Boss Dayadevadas. She saw both in January 2015. But why she did not open
her mouth about this? What prevent her
to write about this 400% replinishable when she discussed about 78% of others? Is it not proving her hidden agenda? Are you ready
to swear by denying this?
After
mentioning the beach minerals in Kuttam, she is mentioning Vaikundarajan. Since there is no
allegation on Vaikundarajan, she is speaking something. Is this the ethics of Journalism?
Now again the Lizard came as the witness to Fencing. In fact the license to
V.V. Minerals was issued after the Central Government officers came and
inspected that there is no sand dune to a distance of 500 meters and has also
obtained the certificate from the authorities and after that only the license
was issued. Sandhya who have seen all the above and was satisfied in January 2015,
did not reveal the above facts. Is it the Ethics of Journalism? It did not
prove Sandhya’s hidden agenda? Does Sandya ready swear by denying that she did
not see the documents?
Which
case was confused in which court? In fact this argument is created on the
advice of a Judge in order to prejudice the Judiciary against V.V. Mineral. As
there are fake addresses in the Face Book to scold other persons, Sandhya is mentioning
the name of two persons in fake as Danial and Banerji. Why she is refusing to
give the details about them? Is it a fair journalism? Is it not duty of people who appreciate her
article to insist her to give the details about this two persons?
After
getting replinishable approval to Dhayadevadas mines, Dayadevadas want to
cancel all other lessees approval. So that, he can become monopoly in this
industry. With that hidden agenda, Daya Devadas obtained an order from Mrs.
Santhasheela Nair while she was the Secretary to Ministry of Mines, who is so
close to Daya Devadas to appoint a committee to study the replinshable and such
other matters. A committee was also appointed. The head of that Committee was
Nagar, who is the close friend of Daya Devadas. But contrary to his expectation,
the Nagar Committee gave a report that Replenishable will be there and that
there are chances of 100 percent Replenishable for 200 days in a year and that it
is not illegal to take Replenishable and that it cannot be accurately
calculated the amount of Replenishable. The state of Daya Devadas was like
scorpion bit the thief. The report of the Nagar Committee formed as per the
Government of India Mining Department Letter No. 16/90/2007/M-VI dated
8.1.10 was also read by Sandhya in
January 2015. But with ulterior motive, she has not mentioned, about the mining
plan approved to Dayadevadas with 400% and the Nager Committee report. Is it a
fair journalism? Or is the ethics of
journalist? I leave this to the decision of those who praised her.
New Atomic Mineral Concession
Rule:
Daya
Devadas who is moving the dice using the force of his partner being the
Congress former Minister in each level, made to extension one Mr.Parihar, a retired
officer in the post of Director of Atomic Mineral Division for additional two
years. The condition for that is, that no permission should be given to V.V.
Mr.Parihar was also following the condition very perfectly. Hence these Atomic
Mineral Rules were formed through him with the intention that it will destroy
this V.V. But this will destroy the entire beach mineral Industry in India and
the growth of India. I did not like to say further opinion on that.
Again
she says , some opinion told by Lawyer Sriram Panchu. But she purposefully
dropped that the said Sriram Panchu is appearing against V.V. Minerals in 10
cases between Indian Rare Earths Limited and V.V. Minerals. Is this the honest
writing? Dear Honest people, is in this way is your honesty also?
It
is told that he said that it should not be given to private sector like Kerala.
But the Honourable Supreme Court has issued order to Kerala Govt., to give license
to private sector and it was published
in all the Newspapers including Economic Times in which the husband of Sandhya is
working. Sandhya may not be finding time to read Newspapers.
It
is mentioned that Vaikundarajan has told that there is no clarity in the Atomic
Mineral Concession Rules. It is true. Nothing is there to deny it.
Sandhya
is very carefully moving the dice to give this industry to Adani in monopoly
along with Indian Rare Earths Limited. Is Sandhya ready to deny all the
explanation given above?
Is
Sandhya ready to swear on her father or on her child that the above mentioned
documents and explanations were not seen by Sandhya and her husband in their office
in the presence of Mr.Vaikundarajan and Venkatesh during January 2015? Does Sandhya ready to swear that, she do not
know about the above said facts and she did not collect copies from
Mr.S.Vaikundarajan including Court judgments.
Is
writing by suppression the truth called the Ethics of Journalism?
The
righteous persons who praised, you please read all the above and please visit
the links and read it and then give your opinion.
What
evidence has she given except copy of her gang member Ashiskumar letter for
which he has already prosecuted and copy of one memo filed by the affected
person during 1996?
If it is righteous persons then it would have
been written that the report of the officer who has enmity should not be
accepted, is it not? At least hereafter you please write.
If
what is stated above is not true ask Sandhya to swear either on her father or
her child in a temple in your presence and myself and Mr.Vaikundarajan also
will come along with Venkatesh. Please insist Sandhya to swear on this.
If
she refused to swear, let her to come
along with you to a temple choose by you who praised her, and Mr.Vaikundarajan
will swear on this. Does Sandhya ready to accept the challenge? Not only
Vaikundarajan swear. We have collected some other evidences against Sandhya to
establish the nexus between Dayadevdas gang and the Retired DGP. After
that, we will release.
Dear
all, those who praise Sandhya, please ask her to swear in your presence denying
all my above explanation.
No comments:
Post a Comment