Fact about fake news Sandhya's Article on 30.01.2017 in Wire

On 29.01.2017, I have replied for the article published by Mrs. Sandhya in Tamil. Paid News Reporter Mrs. Sandhya never hesitate to throw shit on others, towards the kickbacks that she received. On 30.01.2017, Mrs. Sandhya published one more Irony article.

In this article Mrs. Sandhya coated sweet over the poison i.e., in the initial paragraphs of the article, she speaks about the Characteristics of Mr. S. Vaikundarajan. That too, she speaks about all good characters of Mr. Vaikundarajan. In the article she was mentioning, how Mr. Vaikundarajan changed the policy, through Mr. Appu Nadesan, MLA,. What is wrong?  Because of his efforts in Policy change, we earned few thousand crores of rupees, as revenue to our country by way of foreign exchange, in addition to generation of employment for few thousand peoples, otherwise, those minerals would have been wasted & may be revenue to other countries. On Sandhya's point of view, this mineral can become waste, but it should not goes to Indian companies, since she is funded by foreign companies. This is her fault, not others.

Is there any restriction in India, that only one person in a family, has to do the particular kind of business? Whether brothers in the family, is not allowed to carry out the business of same kind? Does she ready to write about Ambani brother or Maran brothers? What is the fault in this? It is a fact that, 200 criminal cases and 150 civil cases were registered against him. It is because, strong knowledge criminals like her were appointed by his competitors who is having strong political power and having partner of an Ex-Central Minister.  Why she not reply for my previous posts. Does she ready to swear refuting my reply?

Will it permitted to make a criminal conspiracy against some businessman and publish the same with ill motive and can she claim that, she is protected under the category of journalist. Is it correct?

Now Mrs. Sandhya accepted that, she met Mr. Vaikundarajan during January, 2015. My previous posts already posed. Whether Mrs. Sandhya, can swear that those replies are false.? Let the supporting geek, confirm from her about this.

Just for publishing Mr.S.Vaikundarajan photo and increase the viewers Mrs. Sandhya is writing about Eating cake, Meeting others. Whether she is journalist or modern prostitute? There is no difference between yellow press and the magazine which published the article.

What is the fault in Mr. Vaikundarajan's words indicating that, he had tried to purchase lime stone bearing land with higher cost? Mr. Vaikundarajan not cheating like some persons. Not threatening. He not pretending that, he is getting threatened and posted those comments through others. In such a way, some persons are ultimately achieving their goals, towards the kickbacks they received.

Suppose, if Mr. Vaikundarajan, might have made agreement with Delta Forecast Company with monthly kickbacks, Mrs. Sandhya might not have written this Article. That company is run by her husband? Or not? Whether Mrs. Sandhya had dialogue with the son of Mr. Vaikundarajan, through that Company? Is it not a type of modern robbery? The truthful persons, whoever supporting Mrs. Sandhya's article, just reply for this.

Mrs. Sandhya published that, Mr. Vaikundarajan informed in the interview that, he has obtained Environmental clearance by paying 60%. Whether Mrs. Sandhya ready to make promise on her child or her father for the above matter. For preparation of Environmental Report the consultant demanded Rs. 25 lakhs to 30 lakhs per report. Hence, Mr. Vaikundarajan told that he has appointed, full time Doctorate candidate who is specialist in Environment, to meet the requirement towards Preparation of more nos. of Environmental Reports. Whether, Mrs. Sandhya can promise that this writing is not made to facilitate false witness for Dhaya Devadoss's appeal pending before the division bench. Let this be confirmed from her by the truthful supporters.

What is the fault in going to court and winning the cases, against Mining Department towards payment of Rs. 15 crores. Mr. Vaikundarajan is not ready to bend before Mrs. Sandhya, who made, honourable threat to Mr. Vaikundarajan.

The objective of Mrs. Sandhya, is that the minerals can get wasted. Even if the minerals are earning revenue to the Government, that should not be get benefited for Mr. Vaikundarajan. Whether this objective is having public benefit. For Sandhya's article, one friend from Bengaluru made comment, that he is aware of Illegal Mining happening in Tamil Nadu. Surely that person may be the member of the robbery gang. Dear brother, I am asking her to publish the proof or evidences. Whereas, in fact she is dancing according to the music played by one Retd. DGP colluded with VV competitors. You please ask Sandhya, whether she is ready to swear on her child refuting my allegations posted against her.

Some illiterate lower case people are involved in robbery by using knife and weapons. Whereas, literate higher case persons such as Mrs. Sandhya and the gang are involved in robbery, by making honourable threats with Press release & Investigations. Friends,  I have sought for evidences only. You people don't get tensed. Convey to Mrs. Sandhya to publish the evidences. Otherwise let her swear that, she has not seen anything, as I mentioned in my posts.  

Mrs.Sandhya has mentioned in the article, that she had interviewed Mr. Danushkodi Adithan. Why she has not disclosed, any details about Mr. Prabeer Banarjee and Daniel. This is like the chameleon is the witness for the hedge. Let Mrs. Sandhya publish those details. Then all the truth will come out and by which we can prove with evidences that they are also member of the Sandhya gang.

It is true that Mr. Vaikudarajan will argue for 51% truth. What is the fault in it? Mrs. Sandhya has published that, Mr. Victor Rajamanickam has denied the allegations against him. Whether she has not seen the documents, which were obtained under RTI Act.? Whether Mrs. Sandhaya is ready to swear that she has not seen those documents? Since  Victor Rajamanickam is also a member of the gang, Mrs. Sandhya wants to protect him, by writing appraisal words.

        

Mrs. Sandya has mentioned in her article that, Mr. Vaikundarajan, will interrupt by putting cases. Let Mrs. Sandhya, list the persons against whom cases were made by Mr. Vaikundarajan except the Sandhya gang.  But cases against Mr. Vaikundarajan were made, with the background of literate criminals such as Mrs. Sandhya. But no cases were booked by Mr. Vaikundarajan. If you attack a bandicoot,  if there is no way to escape, that will react and bounce against the attacker. Similarly, if Mrs. Sandhya wants to interrupt (only for the kickbacks that she received) Mr. Vaikundarajan, who is doing honest business, will certainly react. What is the fault in it? In my previous postings, I have mentioned about Mr. Gagandeep Singh Bedi. Mrs. Sandhya had seen, all the related documents during January, 2015.  If she is denying that, whether she is ready to swear on her child?

Mrs. Sandhya is saying that only Dhaya Devadoss is following to fight against VV.  Its true. Literate criminals like Mrs. Sandhya are colluding with Dhaya Devadoss and planning for crooked ideas. Whereas, Vaikundarajan is remaining and living honestly.

Whether quarrel will not happen in the family? That is the news for publishing. Helping the friends is another news.

Mrs. Sandhya published about initial period of Mr. Vaikundarajan. Mrs. Sandhya, very well she can publish about her initial period. Many people used to talk about her link with great political leader and his son, and matter will continue like this. Can she publish those details?

It is very easy to say that Mrs. Sandhya, is benami for a particular person and the same can be easily published also. Whether Mrs. Sandhya and her husband, is not holding any shares in any of the company.?  Can Sandhya deny this? Whether the supporting geek is not having shares in any companies?. Whether, holding shares in the companies is an offence or collusion? Whether showing affection to the employees is offence?

Mrs. Sandhya just vomited the article towards the kickbacks that received. Also, to enhance the viewers of your magazine, Mr. Vaikundarajan's photos were used in different poses. Instead, Mrs. Sandhya should have published the photos of the owner of the magazine in different poses (or) the photos of the members of her family in different poses.

Once again, I challenge. Whether Mrs. Sandhya is ready to make swear on her child or her father, in the temple and in the presence of supporting persons. If she swear, I am ready to seek apology without any conditions and ready to give apology letter for publishing in the wire. Otherwise Mr. Vaikundarajan and Mr. Venkatesh are ready to swear in the presence of all persons, who are all supporting to Mrs. Sandhya. Whether Mrs. Sandhya is ready for this challenge?

Please reply my challenge. Let, all know the facts. The supporters who unnecessarily make comments against Mr.S.Vaikundarajan also please read all my posts and ask Sandhya to swear refuting my posts in your presence in a temple. Are you ready?